ASHARAM @ RAVI @ MASTER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.
BAIL/10973/2025 · 2025-11-14
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196497 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196497 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10973 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 398/2025, under Sections 143(4), 351(3), 127(2) B.N.S., Police Station Bhinga, District Shravasti. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 19.08.2025 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant is a girl aged 16 years, on 14.08.2025 she had come to Gorakhpur from her residence. After her work she had started up for going her home and when she woke up at about 01:00 p.m. on 15.08.2025, she found herself in a home at district Bahraich. 4. The applicant's counsel submits that in her statement under section 180 BNSS, the victim has not taken the name of the applicant. She has again not taken the applicant's name in her statement under section 183 BNSS. The accused applicant happens to be brother of Omkar. Name of the co-accused Ferai and Jhaluse have been taken by the victim in her statements under sections 180 and 183 BNSS. It is submitted that the case of the accused applicant is on better footing than those of the co-accused persons. The co-accused Ferai and Jhaluse have been granted bail vide orders passed Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar, Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Asharam @ Ravi @ Master .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
in Bail Nos. 9415 and 10269 - both of 2025. The applicant claims parity. 8. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application but could not dispute the fact that it is a case of parity. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant has no criminal history, charge sheet has been filed, the co-accused persons, noted above, have been granted bail, the applicant's name has not been taken by the victim in her statements, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed, on the ground of parity. 11.
Let the applicant Asharam alias Ravi alias Master, be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. November 14, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 10973 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench