Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196493 (ALL)

SANDEEP KUMAR KASODHAN v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL AMANIGANJ MILKIPUR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/6811/2025 · 2025-11-21

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6811 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State respondent to decide Computerized Case NO. T202304230405237, U/S 34 U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006 (Sachin Agrahari Vs. Durga Prasad), expeditiously. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildra, Teshil - Amaniganj Milkipur, District - Ayodhya is directed to decide Computerized Case No. T202304230405237, U/S 34 U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006 (Sachin Agrahari Vs. Durga Prasad), expeditiously, say within a period of three Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shobh Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sandeep Kumar Kasodhan .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Amaniganj Milkipur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6811 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench