Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19649 (AP)

K SURESH BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13590/2025 · 2025-07-08

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010275262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13590/2025 Between: 1. K SURESH BABU, S/O. LATE K.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC MAYOR, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. R/O. D.NO.37/120, OPP MANASA KALYANAMANDAPAM, KONDAYYAPALLI, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 4. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 2 5. SMT MADHAVI REDDAPPAGARI, MLA, KADAPA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, KADAPA YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.13590 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the G.O.Rt.No.446, MA & UD (G) Department, dated 14.05.2025 issued by Respondent No.1 in removing the Petitioner from the post of the Chairperson of Kadapa Municipal Corporation, Kadapa, YSR District, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader submits that the issue in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication in view of the subsequent developments. In that view, no orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.07.2025 4 IS 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.13590 of 2025 Date: 09.07.2025 IS