DIRECTOR GENERAL R.D.S.O. LUCKNOW and ANR. v. RAM KEWAL and ANR.
FAFO/132/2003 · 2025-11-12
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 132 of 2003 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Case called out. None turned up on behalf of the appellants even on the revised call.
2. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 is present.
3. Vide order dated 30.11.2010, the following order was passed by this Court:
"Sri Vineet Mishra, holding brief of Sri Surendra P., learned counsel for the respondent, submits that the sole respondent has died and he will have the address of his legal heirs to the counsel for the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants prays for and is granted one week's time to move substitution application. List thereafter."
4. This Court vide order dated 07.10.2025, as a last opportunity, granted time to the learned counsel for the appellants to comply with the previous order dated 30.11.2010.
5. There is nothing on record to indicate that the order dated 30.11.2010 has been complied with.
6. The matter pertains to the year 2003. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : A.K. Chaturvedi, Neerav Chitravanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra P., Anil Srivastava, C.S.C., Pratul Kr. Srivastava, Ranjana Agnihotri, Shiv P. Shukla Director General R.D.S.O. Lucknow And Anr. .....Appellant(s) Ram Kewal And Anr. .....Respondent(s)
7. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 12, 2025 Arun FAFO No. 132 of 2003 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench