[2025:RJ-JP:22559] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6672/2025 Manovar S/o Sabbir Ahmad, Aged About 46 Years, R/o House No. 715, Kaji Ka Nala, Johri Bazar, Ghatgate, Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur, At Present Tenant At House No. 823, Kaji Ka Nala, Johri Bazar, Ghatgate, Jaipur. (At Present Lodge At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neeti Moirya for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 28/05/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Manovar S/o Sabbir Ahmad in FIR No.299/2024 dated 01.10.2024 registered at P.S. Sadar, District – Jaipur (West, whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 193, 197, 198, 200 and 120B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he was falsely implicated in the instant case. She further submitted that this petitioner was neither named in FIR nor in the statement of witnesses. She also submitted no other case was registered against the petitioner and disposal of case will take its own time. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. [2025:RJ-JP:22559] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6672/2025] 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 5. On the basis of report submitted by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act Cases) No.2, Jaipur Metro-II FIR No.299/2024 was rgeistered at P.S. Sadar, Jaipur (West) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 193, 197, 198, 200 and 120B IPC. The petitioner was arrested on 20.04.2025. 6. The allegation upon petitioner is to arrange and facilitate a surety to secure bail of Amit Kumar in criminal case No.16/2022 arising out of FIR No.264/2022 P.S. Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur. Present petitioner has contacted Nand Singh and Nand Singh has executed and submitted surety by impersonating himself as Moti Singh, who expired one year before date of submission of surety. It indicated that if this petitioner, after hatching conspiracy with Nand Singh has not prepared fabricated document then it is not possible to release accused Amit Kumar from prison. 7. The evidence of present petitioner is against the administration of justice, wherein a Judicial Officer was forced to register FIR to prevent recurrence of such act. Having considered the gravity and heinousness of the offence committed by this petitioner, I am of considered view that this is not a fit case to enlarge petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is hereby dismissed. Misc. application stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /289