PREM KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ U.P. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/9700/2022 · 2025-10-27
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9700 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in granting them houses under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Scheme.
3. Upon considering the facts and circumstances, we direct the petitioners to file a fresh application before respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks from date. If, such an application is filed within two weeks from date, respondent No. 3/Chief Development Officer, Sultanpur is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and thereafter pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from date of filing of the aforesaid application.
4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 27, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey, Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Prem Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench