AMIT KUMAR @ SHYAMU SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9981/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9981 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Sri Atul Tiwari holding brief of Sri Arun Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Uma Kant Verma, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.94 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 61(2)(ka), 109(1), 3(5) of BNS, Police Station Neemgaon, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused-Shyam Babu, who was sitting in the truck along with the applicant has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 07.09.2025. The applicant was driving the truck. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of the injuries as recorded in the postmortem report, prima facie, as per the Counsel for the applicant, it is a case of accident death; the co-accused has been enlarged on bail; the applicant against whom, prima facie, mens rea is missing and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 25.03.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Ram Chandra Singh, Siddhartha Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar @ Shyamu Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Amit Kumar @ Shyamu Shukla be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 15, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9981 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench