Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2025 DAILYLAW 19644 (KAR)
SHANKAR SHETTY v. THE PRL. SECRETARY
WP/6576/2025 · 2025-03-07
M Nagaprasanna
Original Suitbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19644 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19644 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9718 WP No. 6576 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6576 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SHANKAR SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O KARIYANNA SHETTY, R/AT BILLADI VILLAGE, JANUVARU KATTE POST, BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI - 576 223. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 223. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UDUPI, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 223. 4. CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, BRAHMAVARA CIRCLE,
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9718 WP No. 6576 of 2025
BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 223. 5. POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, KOTA POLICE STATION, KOTA, UDUPI - 576 223. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 213. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) ***
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2/ SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UDUPI TO PROVIDE POLICE PROTECTION IN TERMS OF THE DECREE PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, UDUPI (ITINERATING AT BRAHMAVARA) IN O.S.NO.262/2024 VIDE ORDER DATED 16.03.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court, seeking a direction to the second respondent to provide Police protection in terms of the decree dated 16.03.2024, passed by the Court of
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9718 WP No. 6576 of 2025
Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Udupi (itinerating at Brahmavara), in O.S.No.262/2024. 2. The petitioner is driven to this Court on account of an endorsement issued on 27.02.2025. The endorsement reads as follows: »A§gÀºÀ
¤ÃªÀÅ ©¯Áèr ªÀÄtÂPÀ®Äè C¨sÀðPÀ zsÁgÀPÉñÀéj zÉêÀ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ «ZÁgÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ rQæ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DzÉñÀ ºÁUÀÆ ªÁ¶ðPÀ eÁvÁæ ªÀÄºÉÆÃvÀìªÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ ¥Éưøï gÀPÀëuÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ¸À°è¹zÀ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß F PÀZÉÃjAiÀÄ°è ¹éÃPÀj¸À¯ÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¸À¢æ zÉêÀ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ DqÀ½ÃvÀzÀ «ZÁgÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 17.10.2024 gÀAzÀÄ PÉÆÃl ¥Éưøï oÁuÉAiÀİè zÁR¯ÁzÀ C.PÀæ 218/2024 PÀ®A 352, 351(2) 115(2) 126(2) 3(5) BNS PÁAiÉÄÝ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁ£Àå ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ GZÀÑ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ vÀqÉ DeÉÕ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
C®èzÉà ¸À¢æ zÉêÀ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ DqÀ½vÀ «ZÁgÀPÉÌ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zsÁªÉAiÀÄÄ O.S.NO:262/24 gÀ°è ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è «ZÁgÀuÉAiÀİègÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¸À¢æ zÉêÀ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ eÁvÁæ ªÀÄºÉÆÃvÀìªÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ ¥Éưøï gÀPÀëuÉ ¤ÃqÀĪÀ PÀÄjvÀÄ ªÀiÁ£Àå £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄ¢AzÀ ¸ÀàµÀÖ ¤zÉÃð±À£À ¤ÃrzÀÝ°è ¤AiÀĪÀiÁ£ÀÄzÁgÀ ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï §AzÉÆÃ§¸ïÛ MzÀV¸À¯ÁUÀĪÀÅzÀÄ JA§ÄªÀÅzÁV F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ w½AiÀÄ¥Àr¸À¯ÁVzÉ. ¥ÉÆ°Ã¸ï ªÀÈvÀÛ ¤jÃPÀëPÀgÀÄ §æºÁäªÀgÀ ªÀÈvÀÛ, §æºÁäªÀgÀ GqÀĦ f¯Éè
3. The endorsement depicts that O.S.No.262/2024 is pending adjudication and therefore, the petitioner should get a clear order from the hands of the concerned Court for Police protection to be granted. - 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9718 WP No. 6576 of 2025
4. Learned counsel Sri H. Pavana Chandra Shetty takes this Court through the compromise decree which closes O.S.No.262/2024. This is passed on 28.03.2024. Therefore, the indication of pendency of the civil case in O.S.No.262/2024 is an erroneous presumption on the part of the State. A jatra is said to be conducted between 24.03.2025 and 26.03.2025. 5. Learned High Court Government Pleader seeks to project certain criminal cases registered against the stake holders of this jatra and those matters are said to be stayed at the hands of the co-ordinate bench in different criminal petitions. Be that as it is. 6. The performance of jatra in a Temple would entail certain consequences, if Police protection is not granted for maintenance of public order and peace, during the conduct of jatra. It is necessary for the State to accord such Police protection for the conduct of jatra between the period 24.03.2025 and 26.03.2025. 7. As submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, for conduct of jatra, several rounds of preparation would go on ten days prior to the aforesaid dates. Therefore,
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9718 WP No. 6576 of 2025
the District Administration shall over-see that from 14.03.2025 to 26.03.2025, no untoward incident would happen and the jatra or the annual mahotsava at the Temple would go on in a peaceful manner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed. Sd/- ______________________ JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6