SONU KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
A482/7667/2025 · 2025-11-12
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196437 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7667 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application whereas learned AGA for the State is present.
2. Vide order dated 15.10.2025, the applicant was directed to fetch a demand draft of Rs.5,000/- on the date fixed, in the name of opposite party no. 2 / informant.
3. Today, Sri Ambuj Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has not appeared before the Court, though the vakalatnama is on record.
4. Since, learned counsel for the applicant is not present in the revised call, therefore, the instant application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. It is being clarified that Sri Devendra Singh, Sub-Inspector is present in person before this Court in compliance of order of this Court dated
15.10.2025. November 12, 2025 Manoj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Priyanka Sahu, Anju Vaishya, Rashmi Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Sonu Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench