SURESH BABU YADAV v. U.P. UPBHOKTA SAHKARI SANGH LTD. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/14959/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14959 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ayush Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Ayush Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
" WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:
1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereupon quashing the impugned order dated 27.11.2024 contained as Annexure Number 1 to this writ petition, since the impugned order is arbitrary, non-speaking, and passed without application of mind. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 1 to pay interest @ 9% on the delayed payment of the post- retiral dues, w.e.f. the date of retirement i.e. 31.03.2020 upto the date of the payment."
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dues including the interest have not been paid to the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner that if he has any further grievance regarding the payment of interest, he may move a fresh representation before the competent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anilesh Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ayush Chaudhary Suresh Babu Yadav .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Upbhokta Sahkari Sangh Ltd. Thru. Managing Director Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
authority ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 10 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith.
December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14959 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench