Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196402 (ALL)

AJAI PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPT. OF IRRIGATION and ORS.

WRIA/19406/2018 · 2025-10-09

Amitabh Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 19406 of 2018 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.08.2017 passed by respondent no.3, Executive Engineer, Nalkoop Khand, Amethi, whereby it has been held that the regularization of the petitioner on the post of Tube-well Operator w.e.f. 01.09.1997 was not in accordance with law, and it should have been regularized w.e.f. 14.02.2002. The contention of the petitioner is that the order dated 28.08.2017 has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and behind the back of the petitioner, whereas similarly situated juniors have been treated differently. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2, Superintending Engineer, Nalkoop Khand, Faizabad Division, Faizabad, to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner with respect to his right of regularization on the post of Tube-well Operator, within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. The order dated 28.08.2017 shall abide by the decision to be taken as directed hereinabove. October 9, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshmana Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) Ajai Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Dept. Of Irrigation And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench