Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19640 (HP)

SUBASH CHAND v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/11230/2025 · 2025-07-14

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11230/2025 Decided on: 14.07.2025 Subash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate vice Ms. Aruna Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief: - “That the directions be issued to the respondent to confer the work charged status upon the petitioners immediately after the completion of the eight year’s continuous service as per the judgment passed in State of H.P. vs. Surajmani.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Surajmani & Ors.2 Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, he is permitted to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority, whereafter, the respondents/competent authority be directed to decide the representation, to be made by him, in accordance with law and in terms of above decision, within time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 6. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority, within a period of two weeks from today for the redressal of his grievances, who shall in turn, consider and decide the same, in accordance with law and keeping in view above decision, within a further period of six weeks. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 14th July, 2025(rohit) 2 SLP (C) No.23016/2023 decided on 06.02.2025