Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1964 (PAT)

Vikas Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./57816/2025 · 2026-03-10

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57816 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2025 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Vikas Kumar S/o Bhagwan Mahto R/o Village - Shampur, P.S. - Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj 2. Vishal Kumar S/o Bhagwan Mahato R/o Village - Shampur, P.S. - Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj 3. Sri Bhagwan Mahto Son of Fulena Mahto R/o Village - Shampur, P.S. - Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj 4. Jogawali Devi Wife of Bhagwan Mahto R/o Village - Shampur, P.S. - Mohammadpur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Janak Mahto S/o- Rudal Mahto R/o Village- Shampur PS- Mohammadpur Dist.- Gopalganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 137(2), 96, 305, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, one Rajan Kumar is alleged of kidnapping the victim. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57816 of 2025(5) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioners are family members of the main accused Rajan Kumar who is said to have kidnapped the victim. Petitioners have clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Addl. Judge- VI-cum-Spl. Judge, POCSO, Gopalganj/ concerned Court below in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T