- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5752 CRL.A No. 1165 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1165 OF 2020 (A) BETWEEN: SRI. H.M. PRASANTH KUMAR S/O LATE H.R. MOGAPPAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT HURUDI VILLAGE SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BINU M, ADVOCATE- [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. BASOOR NATARAJA S/O B.R. DAKSHINA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.152, PRANI NIVASA 4TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS 1ST STAGE, IDEAL HOMES RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA BANGALORE-560 098 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2019 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN IN CRL.A.NO.175/2018 AND TO REINSTATE THE ORDER AS GRANTED BY THE ORDER DATED 07.07.2018 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., SAKALESHPURA IN C.C.NO.730/2012 AND TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5752 CRL.A No. 1165 of 2020 OFFENCE COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED AND TO PROCEED AND TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED AS PER THE PROVISION U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation for the appellant. On 07.11.2024, this Court has passed the following order: " Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time. The appeal is of the year 2020 and it is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, list after one week." 2. Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied the office objections. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fifth time. There are no reasons for adjournment. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5752 CRL.A No. 1165 of 2020 It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12