Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196372 (ALL)

SADDAM HUSSAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND

BAIL/9796/2025 · 2025-10-15

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9796 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, one case has been shown against the applicant. In that solitary case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail. The bail order is on record, filed as Annexure No.3. The applicant has explained criminal history of three other cases in para 7 of the bail application. He has also explained criminal history of other four cases in paras 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the supplementary affidavit which is taken on record. Apart from the said case, there are is no other case pending against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 18.8.2025. The co-accused Azad has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 2.1.2023 passed in Bail No.15156 of 2022. It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saddam Hussain .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And .....Opposite Party(s) 3.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also considering the nature of allegations, the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the case shown in the gang chart and in other cases, referred to above, the co-accused, noted above, has been enlarged on bail, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, for the period for which he is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 5.Let the applicant Saddam Hussain, involved in Case Crime No.0493 of 2022 under Sections 2 and 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Gosaiganj, district Sultanpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall also file an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bail. (vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date BAIL No. 9796 of 2025 2 fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (vii) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. 6.The bail application is allowed accordingly. October 15, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 9796 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench