Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196333 (ALL)

AMIT SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

NABAIL/1668/2025 · 2025-11-10

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1668 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is served, as stated by learned A.G.A. on instructions. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.049 of 2025 under sections 75(2), 78(2), 351(2) BNS, 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Kowali Sadar, district Lakhimpur Kheri. 3.Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicants file a regular bail application within two weeks from today, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Shukla and Ankit Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 10, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1668 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench