RAM PHER v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE,COURT NO.14,SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
A227/959/2022 · 2025-11-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196329 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196329 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 959 of 2022 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Case called out in the revised list. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition nor any request for adjournment of the case is made. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. November 14, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vidya Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Pher .....Petitioner(s) Addl. District Judge,Court No.14,Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench