Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196311 (ALL)

INDRA KUMAR DIXIT AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HIGHER EDUCATION GOVT. SECTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14715/2025 · 2025-12-18

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14715 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-university and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party 1 to pay the encashment of the earned leave to the petitioners for the period they earned, leave, and also pay the compound interest on the calculated encashment amount at the rate of 18% from their respective dates of their retirement." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 1/Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow and the opposite party no. 1 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Dwivedi, Pradeep Chandola Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Savitra Vardhan Singh Indra Kumar Dixit And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Govt. Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all their claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 1/ Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 1 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 18, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14715 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench