Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19631 (CAL)

SAYED SIHSH MOHAMMAD v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/9227/2024 · 2025-08-18

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 123 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 18.08.2025 WPA 9227 of 2024 Sayed Sihsh Mohammad -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Neelam Singh … for the State-Respondent(s) The records of the writ petition reflect that earlier the writ petition appeared on 11.12.2024, when none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today, when the writ petition has been called, none represents the petitioner. In view of the petitioner being absent on calls, this court is of the view that the petitioner is no more desirous to proceed with the writ petition further, as such, WPA 9227 of 2024 is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. As none appears on behalf of the State, Ms. Neelam Singh, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. Her appearance may be regularized by the concerned authority. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)