Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196308 (ALL)

TINKU @ RATIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9735/2025 · 2025-10-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9735 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.187 of 2025, under Sections 351(3), 64(1) of BNS, Police Station Hariyawan, District Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on the date of incident i.e. 10.08.2025, when the victim was at home with her daughter aged about 7 years, the applicant came and started misbehaving with her. No allegation of rape was levelled. Subsequently in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the allegation of rape was levelled. The age of the victim is around 30 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the inordinate delay in lodging FIR; the allegation of rape was levelled in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 21.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Tinku @ Ratiram be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Shahid Akhtar, Pankaj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tinku @ Ratiram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9735 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench