Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196300 (ALL)

PRATIMA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS

A227/7241/2025 · 2025-12-17

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7241 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.21 of 2024: Pratima Tiwari Vs. State and others, filed under Section 372 of Succession Act expeditiously. 4. The petitioner has filed the aforesaid succession application on 01.04.2024. One Raghvendra Mishra filed objection against the application on 08.11.2024. 5. A bare perusal of the order sheet indicates that on numerous occasions the case has been adjourned without assigning any reason. 6. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to the learned learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ayodhya to decide the Case No.21 of 2024: Pratima Tiwari Vs. State and others, filed under Section 372 of Succession Act expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. December 17, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Pratima Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench