Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19630 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR S/O SHRI HARINARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6732/2025 · 2025-05-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22815] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6732/2025 Anil Kumar S/o Shri Harinarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Devanwada, P.S. Papadada, District Dausa (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6902/2025 Baljeet Singh @ Balli S/o Vedprakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Tihali, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena Mr. Kuldeep Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0002/2025 registered at Police Station-Khairthal, District-Khairthal-Tijara for offences under Sections 309(4), 311 and 3(5) of the BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:22815] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6732/2025] petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that other co-accused-Dharmendra @ Dhara Singh and Ajay have already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 13.05.2025. He again submits that petitioner-Anil Kumar is behind the Bar since 09.01.2025 and Baljeet Singh @ Balli is behind the Bar since 10.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time. Hence, on the ground of parity, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, on the ground of parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Anil Kumar S/o Shri Harinarayan (2) Baljeet Singh @ Balli S/o Vedprakash shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/21-22