SATYAPAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14834/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196298 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196298 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14834 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to count training period of petitioner and to re-fix his pay-scale and grant him arrears of salary.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Finance Controller, Police Headquarter, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Satyapal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench