HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6634 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1- Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Ayodhya, to decide the restoration application filed by opposite party No. 2 which is pending in appeal No. 628-163 and 335 under Section 21(2) of U.P.C.H. Act, Ram Jagat v. State of U.P. and ors., relating to Village Askran, Pargana- Pachimath, Tehsil Beekapur, District Ayodhya, which is pending since 16.03.2017, expeditiously, within stipulated time period fixed by the Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1- Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Ayodhya, is directed to consider and decide the restoration application filed by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vipin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yar Muhammad .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) opposite party No. 2 which is pending in appeal No. 628-163 and 335 under Section 21(2) of U.P.C.H. Act, Ram Jagat v. State of U.P. and ors., relating to Village Askran, Pargana- Pachimath, Tehsil Beekapur, District Ayodhya, within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam A227 No. 6634 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench