Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196294 (ALL)

PUNEET KUMAR UPADHYAY AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/10938/2025 · 2025-11-14

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10938 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Awnish Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashish Saxena, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Sri Mohan Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 7-Gaon Sabha. 2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing of agenda dated 23.08.2024 proposed by the Committee of Gaon Sabha Mahawan, Khajurahat, Block & Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya. 3. The opposite parties have raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus for restraining construction of Panchayat Bhawan whereas no legally enforceable right of the petitioner is being affected by the construction of Panchayat Bhawan over gaon sabha land. 4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant writ petition and he seeks liberty to file fresh petition in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awnish Kumar, Nishant Kumar Shukla, Ram Jeet Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Puneet Kumar Upadhyay And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) public interest. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. November 14, 2025 Pradeep/- WRIC No. 10938 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench