NAVEEN BHARATWAL AND 6 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF NAGAR VIKAS LKO.and ORS.
WRIA/127/2017 · 2025-10-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 127 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., I.P. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Naveen Bharatwal And 6 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Nagar Vikas Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench