Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196278 (ALL)

AMARDEEP BHARTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9898/2025 · 2025-11-10

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9898 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Shri Mohammad Aziz Mansuri, learned counsel for petitioner as well as Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent(s) and perused the materials available on record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no.4 and 5 is dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s) :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of Certiorari to quash the F.I.R. No. 0240/2025, U/S 324(2), 351(3), 352, 115(2) and 191(2) B.N.S., Police Station Dubagga, District Lucknow West, Commissionerate Lucknow, in respect to the petitioner. (ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2, 3 and 5 to not arrest or harass the petitioner in impugned F.I.R. no. 0240/2025, U/S 324 (2), 351 (3), 352, 115 (2), 191 (2) B.N.S., Police Station Dubagga, District Lucknow West, Commissionerate Lucknow, in respect to the petitioner." 4. Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. has produced a copy of the instructions letter dated 25.10.2025, the same is taken on record. As per the instructions, the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been filed before the supervisory authority and the same may likely be filed before the Court very soon. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Aziz Mansuri Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amardeep Bharti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In the wake of aforesaid development, since the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been submitted before the supervisory authority, therefore, we do not find good reason to keep this petition pending any longer, in as much as the same has been infructuous, but it is always open for the petitioner to file appropriate application before the supervisory authority against the charge sheet taking all pleas and grounds which are available to him before the Court concerned, if any such application is filed by the petitioner before the Court concerned, the same may be heard and disposed of strictly in accordance with law. 6. In view of the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. November 10, 2025 Praveen CRLP No. 9898 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench