HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9792 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 11.04.2025 whereby the application of the petitioner has been rejected under "Mukhymantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" on the ground that the husband of the petitioner was not a land owner. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 4 has fairly submitted that an affidavit has been filed by the land owner, who has stated that the husband of the petitioner was a bataidaar and was working in her field. However, this fact has not been taken into consideration while passing the impugned order. 3. In light of the submissions of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we quash and set aside the impugned order and direct the authorities to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from date. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Kunti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench