HIRALAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1153/2025 · 2025-10-15
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196263 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196263 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1153 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.272 of 2024 under sections 387, 509, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Mankapur, district Gonda. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant No.1 is brother and applicant No.2 is sister in law of the main accused Sonu Sharma. The applicants are not named in the first information report. No allegation has been levelled by the victim in her statement under sections 161 and 164 CrPC. The first information report has been lodged after a period of two months. Charge sheet has been filed. The applicants have cooperated in the investigation. No useful purpose will be served in sending the applicants behind bar. The offences are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel for the applicants undertakes that the applicants shall cooperate in the trial. 4. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. 5.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, charge sheet has been filed, the applicants have cooperated in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shilpi Singh Bhadauriya, Mamta Tripathi, Om Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hiralal Sharma and Ranjana Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
investigation, delay in lodging the first information report, judgment of Supreme Court in Musheer Alam versus The State of U.P. and another 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 6. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such surrender, the applicants shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial and they will not influence the witnesses.The applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. 7. In case of default, it would be open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law. 8. The application is allowed accordingly. October 15, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1153 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench