PREMLAL VERMA @ PREMLAL LODHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/658/2021 · 2025-08-18
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19626 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19626 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:41717
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 658 of 2021 Premlal Verma @ Premlal Lodhi S/o Pheru Ram Verma Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Bagledi, Post Kestara, Tahsil And P.S. Saja, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) (Name Of Applicant Only Premlal Lodhi Mentioned In FIR)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Saja, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Markam Singh Verma S/o Hannu Singh Verma Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Bagledi, Post Kestara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh), District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - D.L. Sona Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station Saja, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondents For Petitioner : None present For Respondent No.1/State Respondent No.3 : : Ms.Soumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer Ms.Sareena Khan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.08.19 17:48:21 +0530
2 19 .08
.2025
1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition. However, Ms. Soumya Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 and Ms. Sareena Khan,
learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be kind enough to quash the impugned FIR vide Crime No.257/2021 in police station Saja, District Bemetara (Annexure A/1) in the interest of justice.”
3. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out.
4. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu