HRIDAY RAM v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
A483/849/2025 · 2025-10-17
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196250 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196250 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 849 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. This application has been filed with the following prayer -
“Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a direction to the learned Trial Court for disposal of the case Session Trial No. 83/2024,
"State Versus Sandeep Verma and others" arising out of Case Crime No: 486/2023, registered under section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 and 325 IPC at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur pending before the District and Session Judge, Sultanpur, as early as possible in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the trial of the case in question is pending and almost all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and cross-examined and the accused persons are in jail, but they are not cooperating, and are only trying to get adjournments of the trial. Therefore, the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection if the prayer is granted and a direction is issued. 4. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ved Prakash Yadav, Girjesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hriday Ram .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
going through the contents of the application, notice to the private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 5. As the trial of the case in question is pending for the offense under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506, and 325 IPC and as it is informed that ten prosecution witnesses have already been examined and cross-examined, there is no occasion to keep the trial pending. Therefore, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously, without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. 6. The Superintendent of Police, as well as the Superintendent of Prisons, Sultanpur, are also directed to ensure the presence of the accused persons, as well as witnesses, before the trial court to ensure compliance with the direction of this court.
October 17, 2025 A.Nigam A483 No. 849 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench