Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196242 (ALL)

ALOK SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9442/2025 · 2025-10-27

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9442 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3 and Sri Shashank Vikram Verma, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 17.09.2025 bearing Case Crime no. 281 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of B.N.S, 2023 and 3(1)(Da)/3(1)(Dha)/3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, lodged at Police Station Atariya, District Sitapur. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 3 not to proceed further against the petitioners in the impugned FIR. 3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioners and respondent no.4 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 25.9.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition. 4. This Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. 5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 26.09.2025 the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 13.10.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondent no.4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Pratap Singh, Karunesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shashank Vikram Verma Alok Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondent no.4 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably. 7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of first information report dated 17.09.2025 bearing Case Crime no. 281 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of B.N.S, 2023 and 3(1)(Da)/3(1)(Dha)/3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, lodged at Police Station Atariya, District Sitapur, are quashed. 8. It is made clear that in case, any amount has been given to the victim under the provisions of SC/ST Act, 1989 and the rules framed thereunder, the said amount would be paid back by the victim. October 27, 2025 AKK CRLP No. 9442 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench