VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11981/2025 · 2025-10-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11981 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Mr. Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 is present. Affidavit filed in support of the memo of writ petition is defective as the same is against the rules of the Court. Resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petition to file afresh. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the records, if any, to the learned counsel for the petitioner forthwith. Consigned to the records.
October 10, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Isha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench