Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196237 (MAD)

P.SRINIVASAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

WP/44481/2025 · 2025-11-19

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.44481 of 2025 P.Srinivasan .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Chengalpattu. 2.Tahsildar Vandalur, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Inspector of Police G-18, Thalambur Police Station Tambaram. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the petitioner's property situate at Old S.No.165B/2 Part, New S.No.184/32, Rathinamangalam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District as per his representation dated 25.09.2024 with the assistance of the third respondent within a specific time frame and pass orders. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 For Petitioner : Ms.B.Archana For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate for R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to survey the subject property on the representation made by the petitioner on 25.09.2024. 2. Heard Ms.B.Archana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Ganesan, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the third respondent. 3. It is seen from the records that the representation made by the petitioner on 25.09.2024 was acted upon by the second respondent, but, when 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 the survey was attempted to be conducted, some objections were raised by third parties. Therefore, the second respondent has sought for police protection from the third respondent for the purpose of conducting the survey and also to ensure that there is no law and order problem. Thereafter, there was absolutely no development. It is in these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court. 4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the second respondent has already acted upon the representation made by the petitioner and the petitioner is claiming right and title over the subject proeprty by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 17.04.2023, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to conduct the survey in the subject property, based on the title documents relied upon by the petitioner and complete this process within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Since there are some objections from third parties, the survey shall be conducted in the presence of such objectors. If required, the second respondent shall also take police protection from the third respondent. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 19.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral citation : Yes/No ds To: 1.The District Collector Chengalpattu. 2.Tahsildar Vandalur, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Inspector of Police G-18, Thalambur Police Station Tambaram. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No. 44481 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH., J ds W.P.No.44481 of 2025 19.11.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis