Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196237 (ALL)

AJMER ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15221/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15221 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sabhajeet Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3, Mr. Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5 and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite parties, particularly opposite party no. 4 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Lucknow, to forthwith release the petitioner's Assured Career Progression (ACP) arrears and Insurance Policy dues, along with statutory interest, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramakant Sahu, Akansha Pathak, Suryansh Pandey, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Tiwari, Ran Vijay Singh Ajmer Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4/District Basic Education Officer, Lucknow, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of eight weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 15221 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench