HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1750 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief(s): "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned History-Sheet No. 5648-A, 29.06.2008 relating to Police Station-Manpur, District-Sitapur, opened against the petitioner. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to close the History-Sheet No. 5648-A, 29.06.2008, relating to Police Station-Manpur, District-Sitapur and to stop the petitioner's surveillance, not to treat him as history-sheeter, not to harass, embrrass and humiliate him and his family members and not to make domiciliary visit at their residence and also efface the petitioner's name from the board of History-sheeter register, at Police Station- Manpur, District-Sitapur. III. issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. IV. Award the writ petition of the petitioner with costs. " 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only on the basis of a single criminal case History-Sheet No.5648-A, 29.06.2008 at Police Station Hasanganj, District Lucknow has been opened/instituted against the petitioner, as such the entire exercise is bad in law and liable to be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the said prayer and has submitted that in respect of the grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he may prefer a representation before the appropriate authority, which shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. Having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner may prefer a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma, Mohsin Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Navneet Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) representation before the appropriate authority/respondent No. 2 highlighting his grievance within two weeks. 6. If such representation is moved within the said period, the respondent No. 2 shall consider his representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 7. With these observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Arvind CRLP No. 1750 of 2024 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench