JAY PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1156/2025 · 2025-11-14
Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1156 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of certain defects in the petition, he does not want to press the instant petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition.
2. Shri Ashutosh Srivastava, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. November 14, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Jay Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench