Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196218 (ALL)

JAGDISH PRASAD v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF DEFENSE NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9561/2025 · 2025-10-06

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9561 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents no.1 to 3. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opp. party no-2 & 3 to take appropriate action against the opp. party no-4 in respect of placing forged documents after taking sanction under section 197 Cr.P.C. corresponding section 218 BNSS. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opp. party no.-2 to decide the representation made by the petitioner as contained as Annexure No.3 to this writ petition." 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the for the petitioner says that he does want to press this writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with proper pleadings and prayers. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 6, 2025 Darpan Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Jagdish Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Defense New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench