Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196212 (ALL)

SHYAM JI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1465/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1465 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 3. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.34 of 2025, under Sections 69, 352, 351(2) BNS and Section 67 I.T. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Unnao. 4. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that wrong was committed on the informant by the applicant on the false pretext of marriage. Subsequently by means of affidavit statement was given that both the applicant and victim had married and are staying together. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 6. Considering the aforesaid submission, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail considering the chances of trial proceedings further are negligent. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Shyam Ji be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shyam Ji .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1465 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench