Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196199 (ALL)

ARVIND KUMAR JAYSWAL v. TEHSILDAR JUDICIAL, TAHSIL TULSIPUR, BALRAMPUR AND OTHERS

A227/6267/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6267 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Utraula, District Balrampur to decide case No.T-202508100201625 (Arvind Kumar jayswal vs Kirnesh) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Utraula, District Balrampur is directed to decide case No.T-202508100201625 (Arvind Kumar jayswal vs Kirnesh) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Iqbal Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arvind Kumar Jayswal .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar Judicial, Tahsil Tulsipur, Balrampur And Others .....Respondent(s) 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6267 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench