PRABHAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
NABAIL/1528/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196194 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1528 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice. 2. he present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.140 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 109, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 324(4), 324(5), 333 BNS, P.S. Kandhai, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that general allegations were levelled against as many as 10 including the applicant that they had caused substantial injuries after coming to home of the informant. In the light of the said allegations learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is lady aged about 55 years and has been falsely implicated. It is further argued that co accused have been granted benefit of regular bail and the applicant is apprehending arrest without there being any material against her. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission, the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dildar Khan, Mohd. Asjad Prabhawati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Prabhawati be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on her furnishing personal bond of Rs 5000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1528 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench