CWP-1084-1998 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (218) CWP-1084-1998 Date of Decision : March 24, 2025 Punjab State Electricity Board through its Chief Auditor .. Petitioner Versus Labour Court, Ludhiana through its Presiding Officer and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. H.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Joy Preet Meelu, Advocate, and Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Jaspal Singh Maanipur, Advocate along with Ms. Divya Sharma, Amicus Curaie, for respondents No. 2 to 8. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 to 8 submits that in the present writ petition, the challenge is to the Award dated 17.11.1995 and 19.06.1997 (Annexues P-1 and P-2) by which, certain relief has been granted on an application filed under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 to 8 further submits that after the passing of the said Award, the interim order was granted in favour of the petitioner-institution and he is not in touch with the respondents and does not know whether they are interested in pursuing the present remedy as of now or not. HARSHA RANI 2025.03.26 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1084-1998 2 3. Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case respondents No. 2 to 8 initiate any process for the execution of the Award which has been impugned in the present petition. 4. It is further directed that without there being any specific order passed by this Court, the Award dated 17.11.995 and 19.06.1997 (Annexures P-1 & P-2) will not be executed by any Court. March 24, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.03.26 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document