- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4136 WP No. 6163 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6163 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI BABU.H.V. S/O LATE A.R.VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 115, 5TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY FINANCIAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI-110 001. HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, PROCESS HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, KAMALA MILLS COMPOUND, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI - 40 0013. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. BBM CORP NO.115, MYSORE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, HOUSE BUILDING, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND CROSS, BANGALORE - 560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4136 WP No. 6163 of 2017 3. SMT PREMAKUMARI NO 115, 5TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. 4. SRI MANI KUMAR SETHIA, NO 1892, 21ST MAIN, 20TH B-CROSS, MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.JAGADISH BALIGA., CGC FOR R1; SRI. V.B.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R4 & 5-DISPENSED WITH V/O DT:09.01.2018; R3-STANDS DISMISSED V/O DATED:27.11.2024) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.11.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today. The petition is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4136 WP No. 6163 of 2017 month of January 2025. It is pending for almost eight years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24