BILESH @ VILAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7678/2025 · 2025-11-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7678 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in S.T. No.36 of 2025 arising out of FIR No.32 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 351(3), 352 of BNS; Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act and Section 5J(ii)/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Rudauli, District Ayodhya. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 18 years was engaged in physical relation with the applicant since 2024 on the alleged false pretext of marriage. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim admitted that she was in love with the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage, the physical relations were formed and now the applicant refused to marry. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the victim is around 18 years and the relationship continued over a span of one year coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 26.01.2025 and has criminal history of one case which has been duly explained, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yatendra Pal Singh, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bilesh @ Vilas .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Bilesh @ Vilas be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 14, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7678 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench