SMT USHA S SHETTY v. SRI SRINIVAS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS (R)
CRL.RP/393/2024 · 2025-02-25
H P Sandesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19615 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19615 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8281 CRL.RP No. 393 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.393 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SMT USHA S SHETTY W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O MOODUVALTUR NELLIKATTE POST KAVRADY VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-576211
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI PREMNATH T N, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SRI SRINIVAS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS (R) GOKUL TOWER, PANNER JEWELLER COMPLEX, OLD BUS STAND, KUNDAPURA UDUPI DISTRICT-576211 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR CHANDRASHEKAR SHETTY AGED 44 YEARS, S/O LATE BASAVA SHETTY
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8281 CRL.RP No. 393 of 2024
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 09.12.2024 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE UDUPI (SITTING AT KUNDAPURA) IN CRL.A.NO.501/2022 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner is absent. On 17.02.2025 also, the counsel for the petitioner was absent and this Court observed that this matter is listed fourth time for non-compliance of office objections and in the ends of justice, another one week time was granted to comply with the office objections on cost of Rs.500/- and also made it clear that if cost is not paid and office objections are not complied within a week, the petition will be dismissed on the next date of hearing. Inspite of the said order, the counsel for the petitioner not appeared
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8281 CRL.RP No. 393 of 2024
before the Court or complied with the office objections and also not paid the cost. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and for non-payment of cost as per the order dated 17.02.2025.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN