Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196146 (ALL)

ALI TAHIR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/4007/2025 · 2025-10-27

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4007 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.52 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 137(2), 87 of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant had committed wrong on her. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim stated that she was made to sit in an auto. Subsequently, the victim had called the applicant and gone with him to a different place where she was administer something in tea and thereafter she could not know what happened. The tentative age of the victim was around 21 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the two statement of the victim; the medical on record does not corroborate the allegations coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 19.02.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ali Tahir be released on bail in the aforesaid first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ali Tahir .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 27, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 4007 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench