HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12345 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R.S. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 o 4, Mr. Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no. 5 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents, particularly respondent no. 3 & 4 to forthwith take decision оп the communications and recommendations made by the Director, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow (letter dated 22.08.2023, Ref. No. IET/Dir.Off./2023-1011) (Annexure no. 1) and forwarded to him on 19.8.2023 and to ensure that the medical reimbursement amount due to the petitioner be sanctioned and paid at the earliest, without any further delay, strictly in accordance with the applicable Government Orders and Rules. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and sanction the petitioner's medical reimbursement claim for ₹97,725/- and ₹99,098/-in terms of the Government Orders dated 15.05.1997, 09.08.2004, and 20.09.2011, and to release the admissible amount with interest. III. Issue any other suitable writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. IV. To award the costs of the writ petition in favour of the Petitioners." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshmi Kant Tripathi, Priya Singh, Shyam Mohan Pradhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ved Prakash Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent nos. 2 & 3 and they may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent nos. 2(Add. Chief Secretary, Dept. Of Finance, Gov. of U.P.) & respondent no. 3(Director Treasury, Jawahar Bhawan) are hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before them. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12345 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench