HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14092 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Sanskriti Gupta, advocate, holdring brief of Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to there by commanding and directing the opposite parties to regularized the service of the petitioner on the basis of the government order and the Supreme Court Judgment, contained as Annexure No.5 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. II. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to there by commanding and directing the opposite party no.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner for regularized his services, contained as Annexure No.3 & 4 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. III. Issue any other order or direction deems just and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be passed. IV. To allow the writ petition with costs." It is contended by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner is working in the department since 1998 and his services has not been regularised as yet. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Ekansh Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Suresh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Managing Director, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Tedhi Kothi, Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 8, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 14092 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench