AJAY VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER
TACR/24/2023 · 2025-10-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196084 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 24 of 2023 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
2. It appears that the applicant and the counsel engaged by him have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the application, which is pending since
2023.
3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:- (i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and (ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
4. The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
5. Considering the aforesaid, this Court feels that the application should not be disposed of on merits and should be dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 7, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Verma, Akhand Pratap Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anil Kumar Tiwari (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ajay Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench