SHYAMA DEVI @ SHYAMA SINGH v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/6573/2025 · 2025-11-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6573 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel on behalf of the State-respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3.Present petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed to expedite the proceedings of Case No.17211 of 2025, computerized case No.T202502570117211 titled as "Shyama Devi Vs. Babulal" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code pending before Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh pending since 28.4.2025. 4. It has been submitted that the petitioner has instituted the said proceedings only in 2025. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. Apart from which it is found that on all the dates fixed in the matter no appearance has been put up by the petitioners on account of boycott by local bar association. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the case which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shyama Devi @ Shyama Singh .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. November 12, 2025 RKM.
A227 No. 6573 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench